View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JCirri
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 4576
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: Radium Eyes |
|
|
Note Chart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ejbadger
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used the standard 4-3-2 method here and it landed me in 8th at 81k.
Star use and squeezing might help for more points. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheBrain
Joined: 24 Dec 2006 Posts: 305
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. There doesn't seem to be anything to change with the first and third activation. My score depends entirely on how well I do in the second section. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
FinalAeon
Joined: 19 Mar 2007 Posts: 2915 Location: Antwerpen, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got 1st! Wonder for how long though *waits for Cdw to look at the top scores and improve within a few hours*
1: immediately (a bit early activation is always nice because if you squeeze you might miss the next SP.
2: not the tail of the SP hold but the next note. If you squueze that one you should have 61266 at the pause
3: this one is tricky and also where the points are at. When you get to the final SP note (red hold) whammy twice (once could be a bit better) and activate asap. If you do this correctly the SP will run out equally with the end of the final note |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cdw01
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 923 Location: New York
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
FinalAeon wrote: | Got 1st! Wonder for how long though *waits for Cdw to look at the top scores and improve within a few hours* | Yeah, I got it back without much trouble. :P As a general rule, any of my scores before late March are probably not too hard to beat, as my squeezing skills were not at their prime yet. I'm working on improving all of those, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
de1337ed
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 1066 Location: JMU, VA
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cdw01 wrote: | FinalAeon wrote: | Got 1st! Wonder for how long though *waits for Cdw to look at the top scores and improve within a few hours* | Yeah, I got it back without much trouble. :P As a general rule, any of my scores before late March are probably not too hard to beat, as my squeezing skills were not at their prime yet. I'm working on improving all of those, though. |
There's a different path... I will find your invisible squeeze Cdw, you can't hide for long!
EDIT: Strike that..... I apparently didn't get the note at the START of the second phrase so that's where that 200 points went (at the break you should have 61466 if you're getting all the points)
EDIT V2.0: 3 ticks. I hate me. I'll probably never hit that squeeze again, it's a toughy. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alsoknownas
Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 591 Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
A path other than 4-3-2? I can't see anything else that could work... _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
debr5836
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 1159 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: spopt2.pl results |
|
|
spopt2.pl results for "Radium Eyes" (gh2-ps2/easy) generated on 07/20/2007
NOTE: Easy squeeze interval of +/- 0.1667s is still in question.
This could result in optimistic results.
lazy-whammy (81310) PNG TXT
no-squeeze (81358) PNG TXT
big-squeeze (81546) PNG TXT
nearly-ideal (81558) PNG TXT
upper-bound (81570) PNG TXT
KEY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lazy Whammy ---- No squeezing, all whammys start 0.5 beats late
No Squeeze ---- No squeezing, no early whammying
Big Squeeze ---- 80% of the max possible squeeze, no early whammying
Nearly Ideal ---- 80% of the max possible squeeze, 80% of the max possible early whammying
Upper Bound ---- 100% of the max possible squeeze, 100% of the max possible early whammying
big-squeeze path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: radiumeyes.mid
Solution Path: 4-3-2
Estimated Base score 16317
Estimated 4* cutoff 32634
Estimated 5* cutoff 45687
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 62470
Estimated SP Score 19076
Estimated Total Score 81546
Activations:
#1 From meas 23.0000 (R note) to meas 30.5833 (Y note) ( 22.6674- 30.6674) Score: 7792 (33.0+ 6.0)*200
#2 From meas 48.3333 (Y note) to meas 54.9167 (Y note) ( 48.3390- 54.8712) Score: 6700 (32.0+ 1.5)*200
#3 From meas 69.7273 (R sust) to meas 73.9576 (R sust) ( 69.7273- 73.9576) Score: 4584 (20.0+ 2.9)*200
nearly-ideal path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: radiumeyes.mid
Solution Path: 4-3-2
Estimated Base score 16317
Estimated 4* cutoff 32634
Estimated 5* cutoff 45687
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 62470
Estimated SP Score 19088
Estimated Total Score 81558
Activations:
#1 From meas 23.0000 (R note) to meas 30.5833 (Y note) ( 22.6674- 30.6674) Score: 7792 (33.0+ 6.0)*200
#2 From meas 48.3333 (Y note) to meas 54.9167 (Y note) ( 48.3113- 54.9174) Score: 6700 (32.0+ 1.5)*200
#3 From meas 69.6982 (R sust) to meas 73.9576 (R sust) ( 69.6982- 73.9576) Score: 4596 (20.0+ 3.0)*200
upper-bound path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: radiumeyes.mid
Solution Path: 4-3-2
Estimated Base score 16317
Estimated 4* cutoff 32634
Estimated 5* cutoff 45687
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 62470
Estimated SP Score 19100
Estimated Total Score 81570
Activations:
#1 From meas 23.0000 (R note) to meas 30.5833 (Y note) ( 22.6674- 30.6674) Score: 7792 (33.0+ 6.0)*200
#2 From meas 50.1667 (Y note) to meas 56.8490 (Y sust) ( 50.2240- 56.8490) Score: 6704 (31.0+ 2.5)*200
#3 From meas 69.6910 (R sust) to meas 73.9576 (R sust) ( 69.6910- 73.9576) Score: 4604 (20.0+ 3.0)*200
Please post any bugs/questions about these auto-generated paths HERE. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|